Wednesday, May 4, 2022

Understanding The Role Of The Chief Behind The Chief

Understanding The Role Of The Chief Behind The Chief written by John Jantsch read more at Duct Tape Marketing

Marketing Podcast with Cameron Herold

In this episode of the Duct Tape Marketing Podcast, I interview Cameron Herold. Cameron is the founder of the COO Alliance, the World’s Leading Network for Seconds in Command. He’s the host of the Second in Command: The Chief Behind the Chief podcast, where he interviews COOs and other seconds to share their insights with his listeners. He’s also the author of 5 books, a top-rated international speaker, and has spoken on all 7 continents.

Key Takeaway:

The Chief Operating Officer is the second in command to the CEO – they’re the go-to person that should be running the business. In this episode, the founder of COO Alliance, Cameron Herald, talks about what exactly the role of a COO looks like, how that role shifts and changes from organization to organization, and how having a COO can accelerate the growth of your organization.

Questions I ask Cameron Herold:

  • [2:27] Are there some things in those early days of figuring operations out that really stuck with you?
  • [3:38] How would you define the job title COO?
  • [5:02] How does the COO or second in command orient themselves in larger organizations?
  • [6:55] How would you describe the second in command in a smaller, more nimble organization that doesn’t have that giant C-suite?
  • [8:20] What does an organization that decides that they need a COO need to be thinking about?
  • [10:56] Have you been faced with a scenario where people have come to you with the idea that they have outgrown their CEO?
  • [12:07] Is it possible to level up a COO they feel that they’ve outgrown?
  • [13:34] Is it simply a matter of finding somebody else who has been there in that role before or is it a different skillset or personality entirely?
  • [14:38] How much of the job is directing, forming, creating, or nurturing culture?
  • [15:35] For someone who is looking for a COO role or looking to replace someone, what do you see are some common mistakes that crop up?
  • [17:01] Are you saying that a COO should be looking for somebody that’s going to shore up where the CEO has weaknesses?
  • [18:06] Tell me a little bit about COO Alliance and what somebody would expect if they came to look at that.
  • [19:12] Do you feel like you’re giving some modern shape to the COO role in general?
  • [20:11] Tell us a little bit about the ways that people can engage with your organization.
  • [21:18] Where can people learn more?

More About Cameron Herold:

  • The COO Alliance
  • The Second in Command Podcast

Take The Marketing Assessment:

  • www.marketingassessment.co

 

Like this show? Click on over and give us a review on iTunes, please!

John Jantsch (00:00): This episode of the duct tape marketing podcast is brought to you by the female startup club, hosted by Doone Roisin and brought to you by the HubSpot podcast network. If you’re looking for a new podcast, the female startup club shares tips, tactics and strategies from the world’s most successful female founders, entrepreneurs, and women in business to inspire you to, to action and get what you want out of your career. One of my favorite episodes who should be your first hire, what’s your funding plan, Dr. Lisa Cravin shares her top advice from building spotlight oral. Listen to the female startup club, wherever you get your podcasts.

John Jantsch (00:48): Hello, and welcome to another episode of the duct tape marketing podcast. This is John Jantsch. My guest today is Cameron Herald. He is the founder of the COO Alliance, the world’s leading network for Second in Command, and he is also the host of the second in command, the chief behind the chief podcast, where he interviews COOs and other seconds to share their insights with his listeners. He’s also the author of five books and a top rated international speaker having spoken on all seven continents. Probably not too many people can say that. So Cameron, welcome to the, the show.

Cameron Herold (01:22): Hey John, thanks for having me. I appreciate it.

John Jantsch (01:25): So you are a little beyond the 800 got junk story. You’ve done a lot of stuff since then, but that was, that’s been a pretty good calling card. Hasn’t it?

Cameron Herold (01:34): It’s been a great calling card. It’s funny. I was speaking with guy Kawasaki a few years ago and I said, you know, do you ever get tired of, of speaking with, uh, about apple? And he, he said, do you ever get tired of speaking about 100, got junk? I’m like, no, it was just such a, a passionate thing. But yeah, it was 15 years ago. I think it was 15 years ago next week that I left.

John Jantsch (01:52): Oh, wow. Well, I moved four years ago or bought a house in Colorado about four years ago and slowly moved. And I can say we, we had to use the services of one 800 got, uh, junk because we’d been in this for about 30 years. awesome. So it’s still out there working, I guess.

Cameron Herold (02:08): Well, my, yeah, my youngest son got to work in the trucks last summer for the first time. So he is kinda excited about that.

John Jantsch (02:14): So, so that was early in your career in a lot of ways. And in reading your story, you know, that was a, you were when you showed up as a youngster, so to speak and in that role, that was kind of a stretch or a new role for you. So are there some things in those early days of kind of figuring operations out, I guess, that, that really stuck with you?

Cameron Herold (02:35): Uh, something changed. So one under God junk was actually the third company that I’d helped scale. So I helped build void auto body and Gerber auto collision and then a private currency company prior to that. And then I’d been involved in another group called college pro painters, which was the world’s largest residential house painting company. So I actually joined wing hundred Gott junk as their COO when I was 35. So for me, for the first four years, it was actually a little bit like, you know, I already had the expertise. I knew what to do. Let’s just crank through this. What really started to hit me was two things. One when scale started to kick in, when we hit the, you know, 200 employees at the head office, 2000 employees system wide, it started to get complex and a little bit outside of my sandbox. And then secondly was the text. I started to appear where we started to leverage or talk about technology and automations and optimization. And that was, you know, 2004, 2005 was, I was realizing that it was no longer about working harder. It was about working smarter. And then it was also about optimizing and automation that we could, you know, really scale.

John Jantsch (03:38): So the role or the title, job title, COO, how would you define that now? Because it’s certainly changed dramatically, hasn’t

Cameron Herold (03:45): It it’s changed in a few ways. So 20 years ago to be the COO, you had to be a major player at a major company. And I think we’ve had title inflation now where, you know, you can have a 12 person company. Sure. And they’ve given everyone a C level title. So I think there’s been a little bit of title in inflation. The CEO is really the second in command to the CEO. They’re the person that should be running the business. If the CEO was sick for six months and couldn’t come in, they tend to be the one that has kind of a bit more multidisciplinary, um, subject matter expertise. They could probably run marketing, they could probably run ops. They could probably run chart. You know, they could probably run some areas of the business, but they don’t necessarily have the pure domain expertise to be a chief marketing officer or a chief technology officer in a similar size company. So they tend to have, you know, good operational chops, um, and very strong people skills. But yeah, I think there’s been title inflation. What used to be a director of ops or a VP of ops has often become as COO. And then you still have the Cheryl Sandberg who’s, you know, been COO of Facebook for 15 years with the same title. So just a little bit of confusion.

John Jantsch (04:49): Well, and I would say the other way around too, I think some larger organizations there’s been maybe title fragmentation . I mean, you’ve got people, chiefs, happiness, chiefs, revenue chiefs, you know, I mean, so where, you know, how does the COO or second in command orient themselves then in, in that world? Or are you saying that the fortune 500 companies still needs or maybe needs all of those positions? And the operations job is maybe more limited in a hundred person, 200 person organization, like who you were talking about at home office. The, the CEO really is running the company.

Cameron Herold (05:24): Yeah. If you look at, in any size organization, the COO and CEO are almost in the same box, it’s almost the yin and yang where those two coupled together are overseeing the entire arc of the operations. And then you’ll have titles, whether it be VPs or co C level that are running the independent, you know, business areas, whether you’ve got people or finance or it, and then there has been some of that, you know, movement, like, you know, the head of sales used to be a VP of sales, but they didn’t get a C level. So now it’s the chief revenue officer, right. Instead of the chief sales officer , but yeah, there’s pretty much running the functional areas. If you’re a, you know, if you’re a 10,000 person company or, or larger, you know, a true enterprise level, you probably like I was coaching the CEO and the second command at sprint for about a year and a half. I think they had 42 executives that were senior VP executive VP level. Right. So they, they had a very seasoned C-suite, um, you know, they had multiple division presidents and it’s, it’s just more about roles and responsibilities in org chart and clarity. That really needs to be clear when you get to that size.

John Jantsch (06:27): Well, and maybe to, to where I was really headed with this, maybe the second in command, um, is more descriptive of the job title than CEO. So I mean, how we know that. Yeah.

Cameron Herold (06:36): I didn’t, I said now for the last year or so, I started the COO Alliance six years ago and I said, if I was to retitle it, right, it would be more around the second in command than the COO cuz we have members from 17 countries that we’ve got president titles, VP ops titles, CTO, titles, but they’re truly the second in command to the CEO.

John Jantsch (06:55): Yeah. So, so in a maybe a smaller, more nimble organization that doesn’t have that giant C-suite what is the second in command? How, how would you describe the second in command’s role? I mean, uh, I know you, you know, you know, ver Harish and, and the EOS folks and that, that whole integrator, you know, approach. Yeah. I mean, is it really almost a point of view, more than a, a job title?

Cameron Herold (07:19): It’s funny. I was at a Verne har event about 14 years ago and I came off stage speaking and someone came up to me said, oh my gosh, you’re Cameron. And I said, yeah, he said, everyone’s been running around the conference saying, I need a Cameron. He said, I thought you were a saying, I thought you were like a BHAG or a vivid vision. I’m like, no, it’s just me. And he goes, well, everybody wants what Brian, when Gina Rickman wrote traction and then wrote rocket fuel with Mark Winters, they talked about the integrator. That tends to be the role title or their title for usually kind of the 10 to maybe 50 or 60 person company. And then you really need to get into the more mature titles where you you’re back into that real COO title. Again, they have slightly different thoughts around the, the role as being the tiebreaker where I would disagree on that. I think the CEO is the tiebreaker. I, I don’t think the CEO really defers the operational decision making to anyone in the organization. It, it really has to unfortunately stop with them.

John Jantsch (08:14): It, at that point, it’s, it’s really strategy more than pure execution. Isn’t it? Yeah. So, and, and maybe you can expand the range. I’m gonna give you a couple scenarios that, that I’m guessing that you run into because you work with people in all sizes, you know, coming and going um, what is that organization that comes to realization? I need a CEO. I mean, I’m sure you run into a lot of companies that are still founder driven, very good at selling and they’ve grown. So, so what does that organization need to be thinking about?

Cameron Herold (08:46): Well, and there’s a few different reasons why you may end up needing a COO or that second in command. One is that the roles and responsibilities that are on the entrepreneur or the CEO’s plate, or just too many, and they need to kind of divide and conquer. So they need that partner, right. Or maybe it’s that you’ve got a really key player in the organization that if you don’t handcuff them to the company, they’re gonna leave. So it’s a title. It’s like an MVP, it’s that title where you know that you’re gonna lock them up because of that, it may be a change in agent, right? It may be somebody who you just know intuitively like I’m a 60 year old CEO of a company. And now we’ve got technology coming in. I need a change agent to come in and take us from the way we always did it to an optimization and automation and remote workforce.

Cameron Herold (09:30): And we don’t have that skill internally. We need that expert to come in from the outside. They’re the change age. So there’s often a number of different types of roles that the COO can play. It may be somewhere where the CEO has built the company and now they want to step away a little bit and let someone run their business. So they have, you know, the reason we start companies in the first place is to give us cash, to give us free time or to say that we did it right. So once we’ve done it, once we got a enough cash coming in, how do we get more free time? It’s to let someone run our business for us? Yeah. So there’s often different reasons for that COO role. It’s confusing.

John Jantsch (10:03): And now let’s hear from a sponsor. Look, you’ve worked hard to grow your business and finding CRM software. You can trust to help grow it even more. It isn’t easy, whether you’re starting out or scaling up, HubSpot is here to help your business grow better with a CRM platform that helps put your customers first. And it’s stressed by enterprises and entrepreneurs alike with easy to use marketing tools like drag drop web page editors that require no custom code content strategy tools, where you can create topic clusters that automatically link supporting content back to your core pillar pages to ensure search engines can easily crawl your site and identify you as an expert on any given topic. HubSpot helps your business work smarter, not harder, learn how your business can grow better@ hubspot.com.

John Jantsch (10:57): I’m guessing I’m gonna throw out the other scenario that you also have people that come to you and say, I have a CEO. Oh, but we’ve outgrown them. You know, or how do we level up

Cameron Herold (11:08): That was me. So, you know, 15 years ago, next week, my best friend, Brian, who was the CEO and founder of 1-800-GOT-JUNK. We were actually supposed to go for dinner tomorrow night, 15 years ago. He me aside on Thursday morning at the Vancouver club. And he said, I think we’re done. I, I think you’ve hit the end of your six and a half years. You’re not the guy to take us to a billion. I took him from 2 million to 106 million, but he was right. I was not the guy to go to the billion. And I was the sixth member of our sixth member leadership team to get replaced. You know, we replaced every other leader of the leadership team. I was the last one and they needed the next group of true seasoned leaders. So Brian replaced me 12 months later with the former president of Starbucks, us and Lonnie walked in and said, what a cute little company. And meanwhile, I’m pulling my hair up going, oh my God, it’s so big. And she’s like, this is cute. What a cute little business yeah. At some point the business can outpace the skillset or the yeah. Or really the life cycle of, of that person. For sure.

John Jantsch (12:07): Well, that’s interesting then is the simple answer. You replaced them with somebody or can you actually level that person up? Can they gain this? The, the skills You have to be there?

Cameron Herold (12:17): I’ve talked to a few people about this. So Ben HTZ and I have spoken about this, who wrote the book called the hard thing about hard things. And then clay mask, who is the founder of, of infusion saw he and I have spoken clay, and I have said that it really a, a senior leader can go through two doubles in the size of the company before it gets very hard for them to do the third double. Right? So let’s say that you go from 5 million to 10 from 10 to 20. It’s very hard for that leader to be running a 40 million company let alone 80. Well, we did six consecutive years of a hundred percent revenue growth. So I was clearly by that year six, I should have been replaced. And then the, in Horowitz said, it’s one triple that if you go from 10 million to 30, it’s hard to take it to 90.

Cameron Herold (12:58): Right? And I think you can level up, you can work with them on their situational leadership and their coaching and time management and project and EQ and all the skills. But the business is different. You know, when I was leaving, we had 13 operational businesses operating in four countries, 3,100 employees, systemwide 330 cities. It was just big. And I didn’t have the depth anymore to slow down, to consider cross-functional matrix decision making. Like I was hearing terms, I’m like, I don’t even know what these mean, let alone how to operate within them. And then, you know, that’s all

John Jantsch (13:34): I was gonna say. So is it simply a matter of somebody else has been there? and that’s what they bring to the table or is it a different skillset? Uh, different personality.

Cameron Herold (13:43): It’s a combination of both. I think it’s not only the person has been there it’s that the person has taken a company there. Mm. Cause really what Brian didn’t want was someone who had run a billion dollar company. He needed someone who had grown a hundred million company and made it bigger. And then he needed a new cultural fit that fit the size of the organization. So strangely that, that woman, he brought in didn’t work, he ended up getting rid of her, but he’s then replaced her with a friend of mine who I’ve known for 35 years. We co-founded a fraternity together in Ottawa in 1987. I was president the first year he was president the second year of that fraternity. Now he’s the COO. He, Eric, would’ve been a horrible COO in the first six years as I would’ve been horrible in his tenure, but he’s just done 10 years as COO and has taken the company to 450 million. He’s the perfect DNA for the size organization. It is now and a cultural culturally really strong of it with Brian. The trust is really strong.

John Jantsch (14:39): So I had culture written down. I mean, how much of, how much of the job is directing or forming or creating or nurturing the culture?

Cameron Herold (14:50): Oh, a lot of it, you know, I, I believe that the culture kind of permeates from within, so it starts with the C-suite, it starts with an obsession for core values and mm-hmm, obsession for vision. And, um, you know, really understanding that our people, our employees come first and our customers come second and really obsessing what employee engagement and then they’ll obsess about customer engagement. It’s really, it, it’s all those tenants that have to be kind of first and foremost, and then understanding that if you focus on that, the numbers come from there, you know, I think that’s where the truly great organizations almost build that cult-like environment while they’re obsessing about the, you know, the business processes and, you know, the, the KPI and the metrics and that kinda stuff as well.

John Jantsch (15:34): So you’ve talked about what it takes when we’re really growing that company, but for somebody that is out looking for COO role, or maybe looking to replace somebody, what, what, what do you see are some common mistakes, uh, that, that are that crop up

Cameron Herold (15:50): The most common one is that they assume, and I’m actually working on a book about the co relationship that’ll come out in about six months, but it’s the, the most common one is that they assume that if the person has had the role before they can come into my company and do the same role and they can’t because the company is very different, you know, not unlike having a spouse or a partner in a relationship if I’ve been married, just because that woman was my wife doesn’t mean she’d be a good wife for someone else, nor would I be a good husband for it, right. There needs to be a sync with core values and culture. And you know, if I love cooking, I probably want somebody who likes to clean. If I like somebody who, you know, you need to find the similarities and the commonality. And then also the fact that we don’t wanna get into each other’s lanes. So, you know, Brian did not need someone to run finance in it cuz he liked finance in it. Whereas I have members of the COO Alliance that two of their core areas that they run are finance in it. Right. So because their CEO doesn’t of those areas. So it’s very, it’s a misfit when they just assume, oh, they’ve been a COO, there’ll be a great one for me. Not necessarily.

John Jantsch (17:01): Well. So in some ways, are you saying a CEO should be looking for somebody that like for, in my case, I’m really, I’m not a system process finish line, kind of person, I’m a starting line, you know, think up the ideas kind of. So, so am I looking for somebody that’s going to shore up where I have weaknesses, so to speak?

Cameron Herold (17:22): Yeah. You’re looking for someone who’s your yin and yang, right? Who’s the match to like you’re Sarah is your second in command and, and correct. She is amazing at systems, amazing at process she’s very kind of inward facing and the organization. She didn’t even love being on my second command podcast because she doesn’t talk to the media much, whereas you’re always on stage and you’re the marketing person. And so she’s the yin to your yang, right? The trust is very high. The relationship is very strong. Those are all what you’re looking for.

John Jantsch (17:50): Yeah. Um, there seem to be a lot of organizations built around this idea of scale and helping people, you know, coaching people on that kind of growth. There’s not a whole lot of people that are doing, I think what you’re doing exactly. And that’s working with the second in command. So tell me a little bit about COO Alliance and, and you know, what somebody would expect if they, uh, came to look at that.

Cameron Herold (18:14): Yeah. You know, you, you mentioned I’ve been paid to speak on all seven continents. I’ve done a lot of work with entrepreneurial organizations around the world. So I’ve worked with Y P O in 10 countries. I’ve worked with the entrepreneurs organization in 26 countries. I’ve done large scale speaking events for Vista and 17 cities. And then there’s all these other groups for entrepreneurs like genius network and Maverick and baby bathwater and GoBundance and war room, amazing events. But those are all for the CEO and then there’s organizations for marketers and for lawyers and for dentists and doc, but there was never an organization for the second command. And I really wanted a place where the CEOs could go and spend two full days talking about interviewing and hiring and onboarding of people. Whereas if you put, you know, a hundred entrepreneurs in a room, they can only talk about recruiting for 10 minutes before they need to switch subjects. So we need, we needed a place for them to geek out on the stuff that’s more COO like, and as the whole impetus, we’re starting it. Do

John Jantsch (19:12): You feel like you are actually shaping the role as it exists today by doing obviously you, you have a fairly large reach. I know you’re, there are lots, the world is a big place, but do you feel like you’re giving some modern shape to the role in general?

Cameron Herold (19:27): I’d never thought about that. I guess I would like to now that you, you, I, I think that Gina WMAN and Mark Winters have done a really good job with getting the integr or the integrator brand for traction, and they’ve done a good job with shaping it at the smaller level. I think Nathan Benton, Steven Miles have done a really good job in their book. Um, writing shotgun and an article they wrote for Harvard years ago about the role the COO. But yeah, I think there’s been a gap in having a community for second in commands. And I don’t want to be their thought leader. You know, if, if we had a spokesperson for COOs, it should be Cheryl Sandberg, not Cameron herd. I just want to create an organization where they can learn from each other and be with each other. And so I, I guess, yeah, it would be cool if we could.

John Jantsch (20:11): So, so tell us a little bit of just about all the ways that people can engage, you know, your organization, cuz I mean it’s everything down to a self-study uh, program all the way through some high level coaching, right?

Cameron Herold (20:22): Yeah. So the invest in your leaders course is the self-study program. It’s the 12 core leadership skills that all managers and leaders need to get better at. So it’s called invest in your leaders. The C O Alliance is the clear one we’ve been talking about. We’ve got members from 17 countries. You need to do at least 5 million in revenue just to qualify. And then you have to be the second in command of the CEO. And that’s 12 events, uh, every year online and we do two in-person events a year as well. And then we have the second in command podcast and that’s just one that everybody should listen to where we never interview the entrepreneur. We only interview the second in command. Right? So I, I love you. I think your work’s amazing, but we could never have you as a guest, but Sarah, your second in command was a great guest.

John Jantsch (21:01): Awesome. Well, she enjoyed being on the show and I’ve great have, have gotten great feedback because you do have a, a large audience of pretty focused folks that listen to it. Well, Cameron, it was great having you on this show. I can’t believe it took this long, but I appreciate you stopping by and I do you wanna send anybody? I know we’ve been talking in generalities, but do you wanna send anybody to a website or anything that uh, they can learn more?

Cameron Herold (21:24): Yeah. If they go to COO alliance.com, they’ll find it everything. And then all five of my books are available on Amazon, audible and iTunes. Thank you. I just wanted to be there for your audience.

John Jantsch (21:32): Oh, well I appreciate it. And uh, hopefully we’ll run into you one of these days out there on the road.

Cameron Herold (21:37): Thanks John. Appreciate it.

John Jantsch (21:38): Hey, and one final thing before you go, you know how I talk about marketing strategy strategy before tactics? Well, sometimes it can be hard to understand where you in, in that, what needs to be done with regard to creating a marketing strategy. So we created a free tool for you. It’s called the marketing strategy assessment. You can find it @ marketingassessment.co not.com.co check out our free marketing assessment and learn where you are with strategy today. That’s just marketingassessment.co I’d love to chat with you about the results that you get.

powered by

This episode of the Duct Tape Marketing Podcast is brought to you by the HubSpot Podcast Network.

HubSpot Podcast Network is the audio destination for business professionals who seek the best education and inspiration on how to grow a business.

 

 

Original source: https://ducttapemarketing.com/the-role-of-the-chief-behind-the-chief/

The post Understanding The Role Of The Chief Behind The Chief appeared first on connect social networks.



from Connect Social Networks http://connectsocialnetworks.com/understanding-the-role-of-the-chief-behind-the-chief/

Teachers’ Union Pushes Facebook Owner Meta To Take Closer Look At ‘Harms’ To Children

Topline

The American Federation of Teachers on Wednesday encouraged the leaders of its members’ pension funds to support an independent evaluation of Facebook owner Meta’s risk management practices, which the teachers’ union said have failed to mitigate “clear threats” the social networking company poses to kids and teenagers.

Here are some key facts

AFT President Randi Weingarten asked state and local pension fund trustees, whose funds hold $6.3 billion in Meta stock, to vote in favor of a shareholder resolution that would instruct Meta’s board of directors to hire a law firm to evaluate the board’s performance at managing the risks posed by Facebook and Instagram.

Weingarten stated that AFT members helped students with anxiety, depression and other conditions that Weingarten linked to Instagram and Facebook.

In a filing, Meta’s board denied taking a cavalier approach to risk management and recommended shareholders vote against the proposal, claiming a third-party evaluation was unnecessary because it would not result in appreciably better performance from the committee.

Tangent

With 1.7 million members, the AFT is the second largest teachers’ union in the U.S. after the National Education Association, which says it has 3 million members.

Important Background

The AFT’s announcement came one day after the union hosted an online town hall event with Frances Haugen, a former Facebook product manager who in 2021 leaked thousands of pages of the company’s internal documents to the Wall Street Journal. These documents showed the company knew some of its products harmed users: One document posted to Facebook’s internal messaging board claimed 32% of teen girls with body-image issues felt worse after using Instagram, the Wall Street Journal reported. Haugen informed Congress that Instagram, Facebook, and Instagram were aware of how to make their platforms safer. However they weren’t prepared to sacrifice their profit margins for this. Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of Meta (then Facebook), responded in a Facebook post by decrying the media’s “false picture” of the company based on Haugen’s leaks and claiming the company’s research found Instagram often had a positive effect on teenage girls’ emotions. Zuckerberg stated that he supports greater regulation of social media platforms. A Morning Consult poll found that 55% of Americans had a positive opinion of Facebook in November, despite the scandals. Pew Research Center’s 2021 survey found that 69% and 40% of Americans use Facebook, respectively.

Continue reading

“Facebook Considered A Kids’ Social Network Once Before—But Parents Hated The Idea” (SME)

“Facebook Internal Research Found Instagram Can Be Very Harmful To Young Girls, Report Says” (SME)

The post Teachers’ Union Pushes Facebook Owner Meta To Take Closer Look At ‘Harms’ To Children appeared first on Social Media Explorer.

Original source: https://socialmediaexplorer.com/content-sections/news-and-noise/teachers-union-pushes-facebook-owner-meta-to-take-closer-look-at-harms-to-children/

The post Teachers’ Union Pushes Facebook Owner Meta To Take Closer Look At ‘Harms’ To Children appeared first on connect social networks.



from Connect Social Networks http://connectsocialnetworks.com/teachers-union-pushes-facebook-owner-meta-to-take-closer-look-at-harms-to-children/

Tuesday, May 3, 2022

Musk Reportedly Plans To Take Twitter Public A Few Years After Acquisition

The topline

Elon Musk has told investors he’s wooing to fund his $44 billion deal to take Twitter private that they may be able to cash out in as few as three years through a public stock offering, the Wall Street JournalReport Tuesday, citing unnamed source

Here are some key facts

Twitter’s board has agreed to an offer from Musk of $54.20 a share to take the company private.

While private-equity firms often spend about five years restructuring a company before taking it public once more, Musk’s tentative three-year timeframe could signal he believes he can rapidly reform Twitter to improve its profitability, the Wall Street Journal said.

Twitter was publicized in 2013. It has made a loss of $1 million annually since 2018. And its growth in the second quarter has fallen short of expectations.

Contra

Musk’s prior track record indicates that a three-year timeframe for taking Twitter public again could be overly optimistic. Musk at Tesla has made it clear that he has not met deadlines. Regarding missed production deadlines for the Tesla Model 3, Musk remarked that he is “dumb at predicting dates.”

Important Background

Musk, who had purchased a 9.2% share of Twitter in April 2004, announced his intention to acquire the whole company for $44B. The company’s board initially balked at the proposal, but accepted after Musk disclosed he had secured $46.5 billion in financing. This includes a $12.5 billion margin loan against Musk’s stake in Tesla and $13 billion in loans against Twitter. Monday, Reuters & the WSJ have reported that Musk is seeking additional partners in order to reduce how much of the remaining $21 billion would come from the Tesla margin loan or out of Musk’s own pocket, with the WSJReports indicate that Apollo Global Management is interested in joining the deal. Musk and Twitter agreed on a cancellation fee of $1 billion.

Tangent

Although publicizing a company may allow it to raise capital, the company must also release its financial statements quarterly to shareholders. This reduces the executive’s flexibility with the company. In 2018, Musk announced that he was considering taking Tesla private, remarking that, as a publicly traded company, Tesla was subject to “wild swings” in stock-price and short-term earnings incentives that distracted from longer-term goals. Three weeks later, Musk announced that Tesla would stay public after receiving feedback from shareholders.

Additional Reading

“Musk Reportedly Seeks More Financing For Twitter Acquisition” (SME)

The post Musk Reportedly Plans To Take Twitter Public A Few Years After Acquisition appeared first on Social Media Explorer.

Original source: https://socialmediaexplorer.com/content-sections/news-and-noise/musk-reportedly-plans-to-take-twitter-public-a-few-years-after-acquisition/

The post Musk Reportedly Plans To Take Twitter Public A Few Years After Acquisition appeared first on connect social networks.



from Connect Social Networks http://connectsocialnetworks.com/musk-reportedly-plans-to-take-twitter-public-a-few-years-after-acquisition/

Monday, May 2, 2022

Musk Reportedly Seeks More Financing For Twitter Acquisition

Topline

According to Reuters, Elon Musk wants additional equity financing for the planned purchase of Twitter worth $44 Billion, Reuters reported Monday. It could help the billionaire reduce the debt he has and allow him to borrow less.

Here are some key facts

Musk is said to have spoken with private equity companies, hedge funds, and wealthy individuals regarding the possibility of getting equity financing.

Musk offers to buy Twitter via $21 Billion equity financing. This includes a $12.5B margin loan against a part of Tesla’s 21% ownership and $13B in secured loans for Twitter assets.

Reuters reports that some banks offered support for the purchase with loans secured against Twitter but have resisted providing additional financing. They said that they did not believe that Twitter generated enough cash flow to warrant more loans.

Reuters reports that Musk still is considering whether equity partners will be enlisted to pay $21 billion to finance the acquisition of Twitter.

Tangent

Musk has also contacted major Twitter shareholders—including founder Jack Dorsey and Fidelity—about the prospect of holding onto their stakes in the company’s new structure, Reuters reported. Musk previously stated that he would like to keep as many of the existing Twitter shareholders after the acquisition.

The Key Background

Musk disclosed April 4 he had acquired a 9.2% stake in Twitter, and later made his “best and final offer” to purchase the entire company for $54.20 per share The board first adopted a “poison pill” defense to deter a hostile takeover, but several days after Musk announced he had secured $46.5 billion in financing, the board accepted his offer. Despite setting a lofty goal of doubling revenue from 2021 to 2023, Twitter’s growth has lagged expectations. In the first quarter of 2022, Twitter’s revenue grew by 16% year-over-year to $1.2 billion. The company’s net income grew 655% year-over-year to $513 million, though this growth was due mostly to a gain of $970 million from the sale of the mobile ad network MoPub, and the company reported an operating loss of $128 million in the first quarter. Musk said he intends to boost Twitter’s profitability by offering new opportunities to monetize tweets and that he intends to cut costs by reducing Twitter board member salaries from roughly $290,000 to $0.

Big Number

$253.6 billion. That’s how much Musk is worth, making him the world’s richest person, according to SME’ estimates. The majority of his fortune comes from Tesla and SpaceX.

Continue reading

“How Musk Already Owns Twitter: The 8 Top Tweets In The Past Week” (SME)

The post Musk Reportedly Seeks More Financing For Twitter Acquisition appeared first on Social Media Explorer.

Original source: https://socialmediaexplorer.com/content-sections/news-and-noise/musk-reportedly-seeks-more-financing-for-twitter-acquisition/

The post Musk Reportedly Seeks More Financing For Twitter Acquisition appeared first on connect social networks.



from Connect Social Networks http://connectsocialnetworks.com/musk-reportedly-seeks-more-financing-for-twitter-acquisition/

3 Steps For Creating The Perfect Recruitment Strategy

3 Steps For Creating The Perfect Recruitment Strategy written by John Jantsch read more at Duct Tape Marketing

Marketing Podcast with John Jantsch

john-jantschIn this episode of the Duct Tape Marketing Podcast, I’m doing a solo show where I’m covering a topic that is very high on a lot of business owners’ minds and that’s the idea of recruitment and retention of your internal customers — your employees.

Key Takeaway:

Recruitment and retention are big topics in the minds of business owners today. And I think these problems can be solved with a marketing solution. How people choose to become customers has changed, and we need to be thinking about acquiring employees and customers in a much different way than the funnel approach. In this episode, I talk about how we need to start rethinking the employee recruitment journey and the steps to take to create the perfect recruitment strategy.

Topics I discuss:

  • [0:53] Why recruitment and retention is a big topic on the minds of business owners today
  • [1:29] Why I think it can be solved with a marketing solution
  • [2:01] We just launched a unique, new marketing assessment
  • [2:54] Growth comes from being important in the lives of your customers and your employees during tough times
  • [3:49] Why we need to be thinking about acquiring employees and customers in a much different way than the vending machine or the funnel approach
  • [6:38] Three steps for creating the perfect recruitment strategy
  • [8:00] The four questions to ask your employee
  • [11:52] Thinking about recruitment as an end to end customer journey
  • [12:09] How people choose to become customers and employees has changed
  • [12:36] Thinking about the marketing hourglass as we apply it to the employee journey
  • [13:48] Branding your organization as a great place to work is a killer marketing message
  • [16:01] Keeping your employees is a far better way to grow, not just your team, but your organization
  • [17:11] People don’t change jobs they changed the bosses

Resources I mentioned:

  • Duct Tape Marketing’s new Marketing Assessment

More About Duct Tape Marketing Consultant Network:

  • Learn more here

Like this show? Click on over and give us a review on iTunes, please!

John Jantsch (00:00): This episode of the duct tape marketing podcast is brought to you by the salesman podcast, hosted by will Barron and brought to you by the HubSpot podcast network. Look, if you work in sales, wanna learn how to sell, and frankly who doesn’t check out the salesman podcast, where host will Barron helps sales professionals learn how to find buyers and win big business ineffective and ethical ways. And if you wanna start someplace, I recommend the four step process to influencing buying decisions. Listen to the salesman podcast, wherever you get your podcast.

John Jantsch (00:44): Hello, and welcome to another episode of the duct tape marketing podcast. This is John Jantsch, and I’m gonna do a solo show today. It’s actually been a while, but I wanna cover a topic that is very high on a lot of business owners’ minds. And that’s the idea of retention of internal team members, internal customers, whatever you wanna call them, employees, staff, team members. This has been a really hot topic of the last year, and I think it’s not going away. There’s a lot of pressure for a lot of reasons on this. So I wanna talk about it as the subject that it is, obviously it turns into production issue or fulfillment or capacity issue for a lot of organizations, but it’s really a marketing problem, or at least can be solved I think, with a marketing solution. So that’s what I’m going to present.

John Jantsch (01:34): Hey, I also wanted to let you know that I have been working very hard on a unique marketing strategy assessment. A lot of people have these, uh, marketing assessments out there that that really are just measuring your tactic approach. What you’re using, what you’re doing. I’ve created something that really is heart and soul to the idea of strategy before tactics marketing as a system. And I’d love for you to check it out. Uh, the URL is marketingassessment.co. So it’s marketing assessment.co go on over there and, uh, check it out to go through. It takes about, I don’t know, five minutes to answer the 20 questions and, and the report that you get at the end of it, frankly, is, is enough gold to, to have you actually, uh, improve or find area of for improvement in your, in your marketing strategy. So, uh, check it out, marketing assessment dot C.

John Jantsch (02:29): All right. So let’s talk today about rethinking the recruitment journey. You know, one of the things that I think that certainly I’ve said this many times to anyone that will listen, one of the things that I think the pandemic and, and a great deal of what went on with the, the, the chaos of the last couple years is that, you know, a lot of businesses do pretty well in good times just by being in the right place at the right time. A lot of businesses during the pandemic learn that, but boy, in tough times, growth comes from being important in the lives of your customers and your employees. And it’s a constant, uh, battle. It’s constant shifting there’s the leverage changes, you know, so to today we work with a lot of folks that are saying, Hey, I don’t need more customers. I need more people.

John Jantsch (03:12): So the leverages in many cases is, has gone squarely to the employee. And I think that changing dynamic, I think does have a tendency to allow people or, or to get people in the habit of thinking, oh, this is just a vending machine approach, need more customers, put some money in run, some ads, run a funnel and create more customers, oh, need more employees just go run. Some ads, go to the job boards, put in some and voila pops up some new employees. And I, I wanna share, I’m gonna rifle through. ’em pretty quickly a few statistics that should shed some light on how we have to be thinking about this in a much different way than the vending machine or the funnel approach. Apparently less than 15% of the, of every job that’s advertised on those job boards, you know, monster indeed, et cetera, gets filled by candidates who actually apply through the job board.

John Jantsch (04:07): So we’re spending a whole bunch of money there, and it’s not really producing the results. 50% of candidates say they wouldn’t work for a company with a bad reputation, even for a pay increase S true of customers coming to us. Why wouldn’t it be true? Of course of employees as well, 79% of candidates use social media in their job search. We have to be where they are. That’s, that’s true. Again for customers as certainly as much as it is for staff. 92% of consumers will visit a brand’s website a first time for reasons other than making a purchase, guess who is visiting your website for reasons other than making a purchase people you might hire, or you might wanna hire 71% of employees say that they would accept a pay cut for a better working experience. A flip side of that is I know I’ve paid more or a product or a service when I got, or was expecting to get a better experience.

John Jantsch (05:05): I think it’s just the flip side of that exact same thing. 89% of employers think employees leave for more money. That’s why everybody defaults to more money. That’s why everybody defaults to lowering their prices when, uh, they’re trying to attract new customers. It, again, it’s the flip side of the exact same thing, but according to a very large gala poll, only 12% of employees actually leave for money. And I think the thing that, the point that I’m really trying to drive home here, in fact, if you’re really in a hurry, just take note of this idea and, and you’ll have the essence of where I’m gonna go with this, uh, today. People really aren’t candidates or consumers. They’re both, there’s no distinction. I mean, people are just people. So the vending machine approach of let’s put money in and get more customers, put money in, get more employees, lower prices, you know, advertise bonuses, you know, for getting employees.

John Jantsch (06:05): I mean that, that approach will draw some people, I suppose to you, but you know, people who come to you for a price increase or price decrease, or employees that come to you because they get a dollar, two more, an hour are gonna leave for the exact same reason. So when I talk about the customer journey and the employee journey, or how somebody, uh, comes to, to join an organization, it, it it’s really in a lot of ways, it’s not even a marketing issue. It, it is a strategy issue that I think can be solved with of the marketing approach. So here’s the three steps for creating the perfect recruitment strategy. First one is to know who you’re trying to recruit. And I know everybody says that, but what people forget to say is that you probably already have some ideal employees in your organization.

John Jantsch (06:51): Just like I talk about narrowing your focus to the top 20% of your customers, look at your team. You can do the same thing. What is it about your highest performing, uh, folks, the people that thrive in your organization? What is it about them that you need to understand? What behavior, what characteristics, what objectives, what problem can you promise to solve as an organization? That’s always been true from a, an attraction standpoint for a, a differentiator for your customers is going to be true, certainly for employees. So how can you create an end to end customer journey? Think in terms of employee recruitment pipeline, it’s something that doesn’t, it isn’t meant to be an event. Oh, I have a position to fill. We need to do X that’s. What gets people in, in the mindset of, oh, I have to offer more money. That’s the only way to get more people or I have to spend more money on the job boards.

John Jantsch (07:45): That’s the only way to get more people. It has to be something that becomes part of the DNA of, of all of your marketing. So look to your current employees and I’m gonna give you four questions and you might come back to this, uh, part of the recording. I’m gonna give you four questions. If you need to write these down to, to try to either think about, or even even ask your employees sometimes asking is tough because it’s the boss ask asking. And it’s like, is my answer really gonna ? Is it gonna be used for good or bad? But here, your question to ponder, what does their current work life situation look like? You’ll find that they probably have certain goals or in a certain point in their life that they, you know, have certain values. Now that doesn’t, I, this is not an appeal to say everybody in your organization needs to think and look alike.

John Jantsch (08:35): It’s just that there are gonna be certain situations that I think might be keys or might be signals to, you know, what you’re looking for, or, or at least what you start promoting. If you find that many, uh, folks in your organization enjoy a certain type of work or a certain type of environment, they Excel in, then you wanna start talking about that. That that’s what we do here. All right. Second question. What do they enjoy? What frustrates them in what work environment do they Excel? Number three, and number four, what factors were involved in them making a decision to come to your organization? If you could start to understand doesn’t mean you have to have all the answers, but if you can start to at least think about the answers to those questions, you’re gonna have a better idea of the message you need to take out there to the world and start talking about why your place is a great place to work.

John Jantsch (09:25): And speaking of that, one of the greatest marketing messages, this is to attract customers is to talk about your people is talk about how exceptional your place is to be an employee. In fact, we’ve actually moved many of the marketing messages to be, you know, for example, a remodeling contractor, our people make your remodeling experience exceptional. That is a very positive, attractive message for the people that want to remodel their kitchen, because maybe they’ve were worked with not such so exceptional people, but it’s also a great message for the potential employee. You’re leading, talking about the fact that your people are exceptional. Hey, I wanna work there now. Also, don’t forget. As I reminded you many times, don’t forget about Google reviews. If you’re getting some amount of Google reviews, pour over those word for word first off, what you’re probably going to see is that if your people are truly exceptional, your customers are going to be noting that they’re going to be actually naming them by name.

John Jantsch (10:29): In fact, they might not even name your company, but they might name somebody who works at your company. So start understanding what they about your people, about the experience that they’re having. Those are some real cues to what maybe you ought to be saying. The promise that you ought to start making, uh, to, to demonstrate that you can deliver a better experience. You know, customers don’t actually change comp I mean companies, I mean, I don’t think we want to jump around and say, well, that didn’t work outs, or maybe it did work out, but I’m gonna go look for a new one. Uh, I think we want to stay with companies. And so we don’t really leave them. We leave the experience that we’re having with them. And now let’s hear from our sponsor. Look, if you’re tired of slowing down your teams with clunky software processes and marketing that is difficult to scale, HubSpot is here to help you and, and your business grow better with collaboration tools and built in SEO optimizations.

John Jantsch (11:23): A HubSpot CRM platform is tailor made to help you scale your marketing with ease, integrated calendars, tasks, and commenting, help hybrid teams stay connected while automated SEO recommendations, intuitively optimize your webpage content for increased organic traffic ditch, the difficult and dial up your marketing with tools that are easy to use and easy to scale learn how your business can grow better @ hubspot.com.

John Jantsch (11:52): are the third component of this strategy idea is that is, is to think about this end to end journey. You know, a lot of handing these days about all the things that have changed in, in, in marketing and in business. But, you know, I think the thing that doesn’t get talked about enough, the thing that’s changed the most is how P people choose to become customers and employees. They have so many options today and how they decide on the company that they’re going to, to hire is, is all about the research that they do.

John Jantsch (12:24): And they go out there and, and in a lot of ways are making a decision, you know, before we even know that they’re looking at our organization and this, this is certainly true of some be coming to be hired as, as an employee. So we have to think about the marketing hourglass as we apply it to the employee journey. And so, uh, as a reminder, I know I talk about this all the time, but the marketing hourglass for us is, has seven stages. They are no like trust, try by repeat and refer. And so what I’m asking you to consider is what is, what are you doing to intentionally guide somebody to come to know about you and, and start to think, Hey, this is a place I might wanna work, but then as they start to dig in, you know, what message are they seeing as in terms of a story, are, are they connecting with your values?

John Jantsch (13:10): Who do they meet first? Is it easy to find out more information? If for me, how often people will have a, Hey, come, you know, we’re hiring and then you click on a button. And before you ever find anything out about the company, you have a, a five and a half page application to fill out. That’s like going from, Hey, you know about us now, I wanna buy you wanna buy and, you know, skipping the steps of trust, building that, that really make you, you, the obvious choice, obviously reviews, employee stories, your values and actions mentions in the media. Those are all things that are part of the employee journey today. And in fact, as I started to say, I think the, the beauty of this idea of branding your organization is a great place to work is it’s a killer marketing message. I mean, how could that possibly be a, for anybody who wants to hire you or, or buy your products and services?

John Jantsch (13:59): So promoting, uh, part of your content strategy ought to be in fact, a huge part of your content strategy ought to be, to promote things that your employees, your team members are doing, how they’re advancing, the fun that you’re having at your organization. I mean, these are things that go in many cases in the early part of the journey, they go a lot farther than the benefits that I’m gonna actually receive, because I think people, uh, more and more are, are leaving organizations maybe even for pay cuts or, or certainly not staying at organizations because the 401k is the bonus is great. If the environment is not great, if the experience of being an employee there is not great, then none of that really matters. So then if we slip over to the try and buy and, and obviously substitute higher for buy, if you like, , it’s not a real stretch in my mind.

John Jantsch (14:53): So the try process, what, what is that application process look like? The phone screening, you have so many, and again, what happens is a lot of organizations don’t have an HR department, don’t have a professional who’s charged with the hiring experience. It’s the manager or the VP of something that actually has another job, and this is just something they are doing. And so the follow up and the experience, and, you know, once they come on board, the onboarding, the who, who their manager is, you know, how they interact with current employees. I mean, all of that, their training plan that’s laid up. The statistics are pretty crazy about when people leave organizations within the first night days. It’s because there was, there was no onboarding. It’s true of customers. You know, you’ve heard me talk about Joey. Coleman’s great book, how to keep, I can’t remember now the title, but how to keep an employee no, how to keep a customer for life.

John Jantsch (15:43): Although he is actually working on the employee one too, he tells me, but the idea behind it is make the first 90 to a hundred days an amazing experie. And you will not have the turnover that many organizations, uh, experience today. And speaking of that, you know, just like keeping customers is, is a far better way to grow a business. Keeping your employees is a far better way to grow, not just your team, but your organization. You know, the number one, uh, reason people are citing now for leaving organizations is a lack of respect, a, of a growth path or any kind of personal development. I mean, pay and benefits certainly shows up on the list, but it’s way down from things like respect and, and personal development. And then finally refer, I work with a lot of organizations that have happy, happy employees and happy customers.

John Jantsch (16:30): And, and we always scratch our heads say, well, why aren’t they referring us? And most of the time, it just comes down to the process. The, you know, it’s almost with, with employees, a lot of organizations almost treat it like, uh, you know, an expectation, a part of the job, you know, they offer a bonus. So it just becomes part of the pay. But the biggest reason people don’t make recommendations or referrals, both as customers. And it lawyers is they don’t understand or worse don’t trust the process. Maybe the hiring process for them was kind of wonky. Hey, they like being there now. but the, uh, the process itself was a little bit stressful. Do they wanna put their friend or, or neighbor, you know, through that kind of thing. And last thing about retention people don’t change jobs. I mean, they change about, so the, again, a lot of it has to do with the experience that they’re having, you know, maybe with the person they’re directly reporting to, and not necessarily with the organization, I’ve been running recruiting ads, a skilled labor positions for a number of years, and we test different headlines in different approaches.

John Jantsch (17:32): And the number one recruiting a for the past two years simply just says, respect with a question, mark, you know, do you feel like a respected member, uh, of a team in your current, uh, position? And it beats everything else. We try, you know, time and time again, because that is the, that is what’s missing for a lot of people in the, uh, positions. And I don’t care what type of job it is. I think that’s, uh, the piece that’s really missing. So think in terms of this idea of the marketing hourglass and, and applying that journey to the recruiting process, intentionally helping move people through the stages of no, like trust, try higher retained and refer. All right, that’s it for me today. Um, again, I wanted to remind you to check out the new assessment that, uh, I built it is a marketing strategy assessment.

John Jantsch (18:24): You can find it @ marketingassessment.co – not.com – marketingassessment.co. All right. Take care.

John Jantsch (18:32): All right. So that wraps up another episode. I wanna thank you so much for tuning in and, you know, we love those reviews and comments. And just generally tell me what you think also did you know that you could offer the duct tape marketing system, our system to your clients, and build a complete marketing consulting coaching business, or maybe level up an agency with some additional services. That’s right. Check out the duct tape marketing consultant network. You can find it at ducttapemarketing.com and just scroll down a little and find that offer our system to your clients tab.

powered by

This episode of the Duct Tape Marketing Podcast is brought to you by the HubSpot Podcast Network.

HubSpot Podcast Network is the audio destination for business professionals who seek the best education and inspiration on how to grow a business.

 

 

Original source: https://ducttapemarketing.com/perfect-recruitment-strategy/

The post 3 Steps For Creating The Perfect Recruitment Strategy appeared first on connect social networks.



from Connect Social Networks http://connectsocialnetworks.com/3-steps-for-creating-the-perfect-recruitment-strategy/

Sunday, May 1, 2022

6 Legal Instagram Meme Pages That Are Criminally Underrated

The legal profession, like every other profession, has go-to pages. The following are the two main verticals that legal pages may cater to before we get into the ranking.

  1. LitigationThis is the type of lawyer you see most often on television giving passionate speeches during trials.
  2. TransaktionalThese are lawyers who execute contracts. If you have read about an M&A deal in the news, it utilized these folks to make it happen. As a result, there is some crossover between pages that cater to this crowd and the “fin-meme” world.

These pages were ranked by me after I checked their Instagram feeds. This gave me an idea of the engagement and frequency with which they published content. Without further ado, let’s hop right into the rankings:

LitigationClearly, this is a court page.

At 148k followers, they aren’t the biggest of the legal meme pages, but that will likely change over time if they continue at their current pace. These legal meme pages post the most and have the best content. They are always funny, smart, and hilarious. Their ability to ride the latest news trends is a gift and they have an excellent meme style that works with current events. They also dominate Linkedin. Katie Phang is a notable follower, as well Congressman Joaquin Castro.

Legal Problems– (Litigation)

With 288k followers they are the most popular legal meme page. They also have the longest-running account. They don’t post as often as the other pages and their content and posting style appears to appeal to an older demographic of the legal profession. Their ability to reach such large numbers of lawyers has earned them a top ranking. There is good possibility that you have already followed them if you’re a lawyer.

BigLawBoiz– (Transactional/Litigation)

With 127k users, it is one of the most popular transactional Instagram pages. The memes they post are often funny and modern. Their humor touches on both litigation and transactional practice, but their focus is more slated for folks who are at “Big Law Firms,” which typically means a firm in the AmLaw 100. It is clear that followers are engaged, with the admin engaging commenters frequently with hilarious quips worth scrolling.

Non equity partner– (Transactional)

They have 153k fans and are definitely the best legal meme page handle. This page is similar to BigLawBoiz, but it focuses more narrowly on transactional attorneys who have some finance knowledge and experience at a “Big Law” firm. Although this may not be for everyone, if you are a match to their criteria you’ll likely enjoy the page.

Attorney.memes– (Litigation)

With 153k users, it seems like they have the litigator in their sights. While they may not post as much as some other pages but get great engagement, when they do post they are more popular than others.

OnlyAssociates– (Litigation)

They have 66k fans, making them the least popular page on the list. However, their content is great and makes good use of non-traditional meme formats. Definitely worth a follow if you’re looking for more legal meme pages.

These pages show that lawyers are not in easy situations. They seem to be able to make light of their circumstances, which is sure helping them through weeks of continuous billing.

The post 6 Legal Instagram Meme Pages That Are Criminally Underrated appeared first on Social Media Explorer.

Original source: https://socialmediaexplorer.com/content-sections/news-and-noise/6-legal-instagram-meme-pages-that-are-criminally-underrated/

The post 6 Legal Instagram Meme Pages That Are Criminally Underrated appeared first on connect social networks.



from Connect Social Networks http://connectsocialnetworks.com/6-legal-instagram-meme-pages-that-are-criminally-underrated/

Saturday, April 30, 2022

Weekend Favs April 30

Weekend Favs April 30 written by John Jantsch read more at Duct Tape Marketing

My weekend blog post routine includes posting links to a handful of tools or great content I ran across during the week.

I don’t go into depth about the finds, but encourage you to check them out if they sound interesting. The photo in the post is a favorite for the week from an online source or one that I took out there on the road.

  • Aircam – is a real-time, AI-powered platform that provides professional business photos for multi-location businesses at an affordable price.
  • Ludwig.guru – is a linguistic search engine that helps you find the perfect word or sentence to express your ideas. Essentially, it helps you write better English in an easy and smart way.
  • Wizenguides – Essential strategy guides for the busy startup founder. These online guides were built to help entrepreneurs avoid common mistakes and take guessing out of their work. 

These are my weekend favs, I would love to hear about some of yours – Tweet me @ducttape

Original source: https://ducttapemarketing.com/weekend-favs-april-30/

The post Weekend Favs April 30 appeared first on connect social networks.



from Connect Social Networks http://connectsocialnetworks.com/weekend-favs-april-30/